happytown
this sidestepping of questionable ethics by the absolute is definitely a great threat and potential problem. The question i am asking is: is this problem actualizing in the moo group with malicious intent?
what questionable ethics are we talking about?
who, if anybody, is intentionally using the absolute to cover up his or her questionable conduct?
in fact how closed is the environment? from my experience not very closed, of course for the absolute inner circle who are heavily invested leaving will be difficult psychologically, but again, is this by someones explicit malicious intent? i dont think so.
if this problem is only potentially but not actually there, we might be a little too quick to be label this a destructive cult.
there is great trust in moo and harm reports will not be easily acknowledge by devoted followers, but here we have critical minds amongst us. what reports can we put forward to convince ourselves that moo's group intentionally exploits followers? I havent seen it.
this sidestepping of questionable ethics by the absolute is definitely a great threat and potential problem. The question i am asking is: is this problem actualizing in the moo group with malicious intent?
what questionable ethics are we talking about?
who, if anybody, is intentionally using the absolute to cover up his or her questionable conduct?
in fact how closed is the environment? from my experience not very closed, of course for the absolute inner circle who are heavily invested leaving will be difficult psychologically, but again, is this by someones explicit malicious intent? i dont think so.
if this problem is only potentially but not actually there, we might be a little too quick to be label this a destructive cult.
there is great trust in moo and harm reports will not be easily acknowledge by devoted followers, but here we have critical minds amongst us. what reports can we put forward to convince ourselves that moo's group intentionally exploits followers? I havent seen it.