TULSI IS COMPROMISED
Tulsi Gabbard can be elected President. Why should this be of concern? Read
Corboy’s Post on the Negative Impact of Hindu Cults
Do not underestimate Tulsi’s ability to win the Presidency given both her liberal and libertarian views. I am sure her Hindu astrologers are weighing 2020 vs 2024.
But she is compromised by her undeniable connection to Chris Butler and his secretive, destructive cult. In my opinion, this made her a perfect candidate for the unscrupulous Democrats in Washington D.C. They can threaten to expose her and her guru very easily. She’s keeping the family secrets regarding Mr. Butler. This makes her easy to manipulate.
When she stepped out of the party line, she lost funding from huge Democratic donors. She supported Bernie instead of Hillary. It’s in Wikileaks. So she is more dependent on foreign and Hindu donors. She was admonished for going to Trump Tower to explain her Stop Arming Terrorists Act and anti-foreign intervention stance. She spoke to him about failed US policy regarding regime changes and undeclared wars bypassing Congress.
These acts led to her losing some of her “Star” status in the Democratic Party, so she lent her name to the ‘Impeach Trump” cause in an attempt to get in line again. She says she’s, “researching impeachment” to hedge her bets.
Tulsi is not a free person. She is either beholden to her guru or to the Democratic Party.
The burden of leadership requires that one disavows dangerous ideologies and practices. She clearly has no problem doing this regarding terrorists. Does she have to compromise to any entity to keep her office? Is it against the best interest of her constituents?
The focus of this post is on her affiliation with the Butler cult, which she has publicly sworn allegiance. What does she have to compromise or hide for the great debt she owes her guru? He groomed her father and turned him from a tennis pro to a Senator. Tulsi would not be a Congresswoman without the hidden hand of Butler. This is a reality. So what does she owe gurudev? What is she willing to do?
In the military model of leadership, the General or Corporal is responsible for his/her troops. If the underlings screw up, the blame flows uphill. In a cult, the leader never takes responsibility. This is especially true in the Butler cult. There is a reason that there is no membership list or way to determine who is in the cult. Butler never takes responsibility for the actions and scandals he has put into motion that has ruined lives. Rick Reed’s career was ruined by the Inouye scandal, which was more than likely directed by puppet master Butler (In my opinion). Last heard, he is a used car salesman.
And what of justice for Sri Shim? What came of that? Was there undue influence because of Mike Gabbard’s position? Was there a cover-up to protect the cult member responsible for his death?
The meme of “we are not a group” is the main way Butler never takes responsibility for his influence. He is all too eager to never take the fall or absorb the financial or emotional loss visited upon his followers. And they take it willingly. Why? Because they believe that he is infallible and perfect. That’s dangerous Kim Jong-un territory.
Leadership has its burdens and benefits. It is a cop out to be a leader of a movement like Butler and then hide and disappear when there is trouble. He opts in to take the benefit, but then cops out when things go wrong. “Who can blame me for this?” That’s Tulsi’s darling guru dev. So what kind of leader can she be by following such an irresponsible guru? Leadership means you have to assume responsibility and disavow destructive practices and ideas.
Politicians have always manipulated the optics. Perception becomes reality regardless if it is true or not. Tulsi has built her reputation on being honest, compassionate, and spiritual. She’s the “Eat, Pray, Aloha” candidate. And yet, there is a dark cloud of omission that hangs over her head. It took her years to publicly admit she was a follower. She and her staff are part of a secretive cult that worships and serves above all things, Chris Butler. This makes her a compromised candidate. She is not free from blackmail or manipulation.
To get my vote, this is what I would like to hear from Tulsi Gabbard. I would like her and her devotee staff to acknowledge publicly like John F. Kennedy did that while they are Hindus, Vaishnavas, followers of gurudev Siddhaswarupananda, that they are not beholden to their guru in public matters.
I would like her to say that she does not speak for her religion, nor does her religion/religious leader speak for her. I would like her to publicly state that her guru does not have any undue influence over her or her staff. Further, I would like her to express sorrow and compassion to all those hurt directly or indirectly by her gurudev and to distance herself from all practices within the cult that cause harm.
Her guru is not perfect and her cult has harmed families. There are over 600 pages of testimony on this forum. I would like Tulsi to disavow those practices that are destructive and do not serve her constituency according to their true needs. Readers can find innumerable examples on this forum. One is the practice of forcing families to break up if one family member is not a true believer and has blasphemed (questioned) the divinity of Chris Butler. The followers fear they will destroy their spiritual life if they hear anything against their guru. This forum is banned. Will Tulsi go against the First Amendment? Will she support blasphemy laws?
Also, Tulsi has friendly ties to the Modi government, which recently passed a bill that makes it illegal to slaughter cows in India. This directly punishes followers of other religions who eat meat. While this may be on Butler’s wish list for America, it harms the people who are not vegetarians. While Modi has placed a ban on cow killing, he has not banned Muslim killing.
Modi's Ban on Cow Killing
In order to support Tulsi, I’d like her to present a bill that makes it so that no candidate running for office may accept donations for their campaigns from foreign governments or non-Americans. This applies to foundations when they leave office. I also like the idea of no lobbying for 7 years after they leave office. While she doesn’t want America to be in the weapons-selling business, she shouldn't be in the "pay to play" business either.
The bottom line for me is that there is a lot I like about Tulsi's politics, but she's made some stupid moves as well. Never mind. She seems like a good kid with good intentions. But how much of that is real? She can't serve gurudev as he is and the country as it needs simultaneously. It takes way too much rationalization to ignore Butler. I say disavow what needs to be disavowed.
Tulsi Gabbard can be elected President. Why should this be of concern? Read
Corboy’s Post on the Negative Impact of Hindu Cults
Do not underestimate Tulsi’s ability to win the Presidency given both her liberal and libertarian views. I am sure her Hindu astrologers are weighing 2020 vs 2024.
But she is compromised by her undeniable connection to Chris Butler and his secretive, destructive cult. In my opinion, this made her a perfect candidate for the unscrupulous Democrats in Washington D.C. They can threaten to expose her and her guru very easily. She’s keeping the family secrets regarding Mr. Butler. This makes her easy to manipulate.
When she stepped out of the party line, she lost funding from huge Democratic donors. She supported Bernie instead of Hillary. It’s in Wikileaks. So she is more dependent on foreign and Hindu donors. She was admonished for going to Trump Tower to explain her Stop Arming Terrorists Act and anti-foreign intervention stance. She spoke to him about failed US policy regarding regime changes and undeclared wars bypassing Congress.
These acts led to her losing some of her “Star” status in the Democratic Party, so she lent her name to the ‘Impeach Trump” cause in an attempt to get in line again. She says she’s, “researching impeachment” to hedge her bets.
Tulsi is not a free person. She is either beholden to her guru or to the Democratic Party.
The burden of leadership requires that one disavows dangerous ideologies and practices. She clearly has no problem doing this regarding terrorists. Does she have to compromise to any entity to keep her office? Is it against the best interest of her constituents?
The focus of this post is on her affiliation with the Butler cult, which she has publicly sworn allegiance. What does she have to compromise or hide for the great debt she owes her guru? He groomed her father and turned him from a tennis pro to a Senator. Tulsi would not be a Congresswoman without the hidden hand of Butler. This is a reality. So what does she owe gurudev? What is she willing to do?
In the military model of leadership, the General or Corporal is responsible for his/her troops. If the underlings screw up, the blame flows uphill. In a cult, the leader never takes responsibility. This is especially true in the Butler cult. There is a reason that there is no membership list or way to determine who is in the cult. Butler never takes responsibility for the actions and scandals he has put into motion that has ruined lives. Rick Reed’s career was ruined by the Inouye scandal, which was more than likely directed by puppet master Butler (In my opinion). Last heard, he is a used car salesman.
And what of justice for Sri Shim? What came of that? Was there undue influence because of Mike Gabbard’s position? Was there a cover-up to protect the cult member responsible for his death?
The meme of “we are not a group” is the main way Butler never takes responsibility for his influence. He is all too eager to never take the fall or absorb the financial or emotional loss visited upon his followers. And they take it willingly. Why? Because they believe that he is infallible and perfect. That’s dangerous Kim Jong-un territory.
Leadership has its burdens and benefits. It is a cop out to be a leader of a movement like Butler and then hide and disappear when there is trouble. He opts in to take the benefit, but then cops out when things go wrong. “Who can blame me for this?” That’s Tulsi’s darling guru dev. So what kind of leader can she be by following such an irresponsible guru? Leadership means you have to assume responsibility and disavow destructive practices and ideas.
Politicians have always manipulated the optics. Perception becomes reality regardless if it is true or not. Tulsi has built her reputation on being honest, compassionate, and spiritual. She’s the “Eat, Pray, Aloha” candidate. And yet, there is a dark cloud of omission that hangs over her head. It took her years to publicly admit she was a follower. She and her staff are part of a secretive cult that worships and serves above all things, Chris Butler. This makes her a compromised candidate. She is not free from blackmail or manipulation.
To get my vote, this is what I would like to hear from Tulsi Gabbard. I would like her and her devotee staff to acknowledge publicly like John F. Kennedy did that while they are Hindus, Vaishnavas, followers of gurudev Siddhaswarupananda, that they are not beholden to their guru in public matters.
I would like her to say that she does not speak for her religion, nor does her religion/religious leader speak for her. I would like her to publicly state that her guru does not have any undue influence over her or her staff. Further, I would like her to express sorrow and compassion to all those hurt directly or indirectly by her gurudev and to distance herself from all practices within the cult that cause harm.
Quote
JOHN F. KENNEDY
"...I am not the Catholic candidate for president. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for president, who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the church does not speak for me.
Whatever issue may come before me as president — on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject — I will make my decision in accordance with these views, in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide otherwise."
SEE: Kennedy's Full Speech on His Religion
Her guru is not perfect and her cult has harmed families. There are over 600 pages of testimony on this forum. I would like Tulsi to disavow those practices that are destructive and do not serve her constituency according to their true needs. Readers can find innumerable examples on this forum. One is the practice of forcing families to break up if one family member is not a true believer and has blasphemed (questioned) the divinity of Chris Butler. The followers fear they will destroy their spiritual life if they hear anything against their guru. This forum is banned. Will Tulsi go against the First Amendment? Will she support blasphemy laws?
Also, Tulsi has friendly ties to the Modi government, which recently passed a bill that makes it illegal to slaughter cows in India. This directly punishes followers of other religions who eat meat. While this may be on Butler’s wish list for America, it harms the people who are not vegetarians. While Modi has placed a ban on cow killing, he has not banned Muslim killing.
Modi's Ban on Cow Killing
In order to support Tulsi, I’d like her to present a bill that makes it so that no candidate running for office may accept donations for their campaigns from foreign governments or non-Americans. This applies to foundations when they leave office. I also like the idea of no lobbying for 7 years after they leave office. While she doesn’t want America to be in the weapons-selling business, she shouldn't be in the "pay to play" business either.
The bottom line for me is that there is a lot I like about Tulsi's politics, but she's made some stupid moves as well. Never mind. She seems like a good kid with good intentions. But how much of that is real? She can't serve gurudev as he is and the country as it needs simultaneously. It takes way too much rationalization to ignore Butler. I say disavow what needs to be disavowed.