One comment following the article
Corboy note:
It is also possible that Gafni, like other abusive persons, developed
a way to identify exactly those persons most likely to freeze and go into a shock/speechless stance in response to a boundary violation.
Very many persons who lack trust in themnselves react exactly this way. A shock
freeze reaction on their part DOES NOT SIGNIFY CONSENT - IT NON VERBALLY SIGNALS FEAR, EVEN TERROR.
This has been termed "reflexive passivity".
A true spiritual practitioner would be someone lovingly attuned to persons and would be able to read this shock freeze speechless reaction as a signal to STOP, STEP BACK, and then mirror to that person that you see them looking frozen, then protect them.
Only a non attuned ox or a predatorially attuned person would read this freeze reaction as consent to go further.
Here are some articles on how "reflexive passivity" operates.
[forum.culteducation.com]
[forum.culteducation.com]
Quote
http://www.awakeninthedream.com/marc-gafni/ark Forman says:
August 28, 2016 at 4:00 am
Speaking from being on the inside of the Integral community, there is no need to invoke as a phenomena as flimsy and new-agey as “wetiko.” The truth was much more basic… Gafni did a lot of his alleged perpetration pre-internet (leaving scattered evidence which was not easily compiled until much later) and there was otherwise not a very clear way to discern if he was just slightly damaged or a true victimizer. Gafni existed in this grey area and – like the narcissist that he is – benefited from playing the victim and putting up a wall of earnest denial. That made denouncing him for some time – based on mostly anonymous victim reports and warnings from distant Jewish communities – a dicey proposition.
Also, without invoking “wetiko,” we just have to see that Gafni exploited a bunch of normal individuals who had trouble seeing and recognizing a personality disordered person in action. If there is anything to debunk here, it’s the idea that the leading lights of the Integral community you mention are actually psychologically astute persons beyond what other educated individuals are. They are most assuredly not. Sally Kempton is a very dull woman on that level. Wilber – who is otherwise brilliant as a theorist and is a nice fellow – has relatively weak interpersonal skills and has let several personality disordered teachers get past his radar (he seems to have a blind spot around narcissists). There’s nothing shocking about this and it doesn’t take a major statement to figure out how this happened. It happens all the time in every community and in every culture.
Those of us who saw that Gafni was damaged – though I don’t think most of us knew quite how badly until later – were stuck amongst those who we personally knew and liked and who were swayed by Gafni. It just took time for Gafni to burn enough bridges so that the good will created by his charisma eroded, but it had been eroding in earnest since 2008.
Corboy note:
It is also possible that Gafni, like other abusive persons, developed
a way to identify exactly those persons most likely to freeze and go into a shock/speechless stance in response to a boundary violation.
Very many persons who lack trust in themnselves react exactly this way. A shock
freeze reaction on their part DOES NOT SIGNIFY CONSENT - IT NON VERBALLY SIGNALS FEAR, EVEN TERROR.
This has been termed "reflexive passivity".
A true spiritual practitioner would be someone lovingly attuned to persons and would be able to read this shock freeze speechless reaction as a signal to STOP, STEP BACK, and then mirror to that person that you see them looking frozen, then protect them.
Only a non attuned ox or a predatorially attuned person would read this freeze reaction as consent to go further.
Here are some articles on how "reflexive passivity" operates.
[forum.culteducation.com]
[forum.culteducation.com]