Far from “abusive/coercive”, these enterprises were bought into existence in an atmosphere of equality and collaboration with strong, independent women and men and to suggest anything else undermines the strength of personality and self-determination of these people who would not respond well to abusive behavior. To call these businesses/projects a cult implies some crowd of followers, which is ludicrous, unless you want to call every customer of the restaurant a cult follower and to call Michael a Guru equally ludicrous, or are we now calling all who initiate projects in Glastonbury Gurus? To call Michael O’Connell a phony healer may very well be slander as he has qualifications and has helped many people through the Cleansing Retreat Centre where he has received positive and heart felt testimonials. I would also suggest that as this entry has been here since 2008 and there have been no others in support of it, that it could been seen as a personal vendetta and I quote from this web sites’ terms… “Vitriolic posts that personally attack people, will not be tolerated and are grounds for banning the author from this message board.” and because of this I think there is a strong case for the above comment to be taken off the site; and I quote from your site again…. “Any comment posted at this message board may subsequently be edited or deleted by the specifically designated moderators.”
↧