[www.elephantjournal.com]
Corboy
"None of my questions mattered. I had done what I needed to do. I did'nt need to get angry at him."
This teacher violated confidentiality. He had held her hands, communicating warmth and empathy, then used public language that demeaned what she had said to him.
And, she was PAYING this teacher for his expertise and so had consumer rights as well as the basic human right to fair treatment.
The author reported her dismay that the teacher did not reciprocate the respect she had given him.
So to be the type of yogi she'd been trained to be, she strangled her insight at birth and descided her emotions and questions did not matter.
So here she is, using the mindset of yoga culture to invalidate the basic worth of her own perspective, her own feelings her own humanity.
This mindset is not universal but is so frequent in yoga culture that is passes as part of practice.
This is the very mindset that Matthew Remski is concerned about and has analysed in articles quoted further back on this discussion thread.
Quote
t’s easy to fall into the hole of an eating disorder; getting out of it means struggling and clawing and falling down sometimes and even starting at the bottom again for the hundredth time, wondering why it has to be so hard. And for me, animal protein is my silver bullet. It’s not a question of how easy it is to recover. It’s whether it’s possible at all. And that raw, slimy chicken breast is appealing to me precisely because it brings full recovery within the realm of possibility.
This is why I went up to talk to the teacher after the morning session. He had asked for feedback, and I wanted to let him know that sometimes, certain words delivered by a person in a position of power, knowledge and trust, can have devastatingly unforeseen consequences.
It’s hard for me to share details of my eating disorder in person. I was shaky and emotional when I told him about my experience. During our conversation, I made it clear that I respected his choice not to eat animals and that I simply wanted him to know that for some people—notably me—a vegetarian diet may corrupt the very principle it purports to defend:
Quote
ur motives were pure, but our means were questionable. And in retrospect, I’m guessing that many of these students, like myself, were suffering from eating disorders, hiding our pathology behind a veil of leafy greens and humanity.
I’ve had food and body image issues from an early age. I thought I had outgrown most of them. But the sheer stress and impossibility of controlling my self-worth as a yogini through my diet pushed me from being a somewhat insecure, body-dismorphic, occasional binge eater to a full-blown bulimic. It happened quickly and got out of control before I even realized I was in trouble. I was caught up in a horrible downward spiral, and the harder I struggled to maintain my purity as a yogic eater, the more deeply I dug myself in.
Quote
tried to explain this to the Midwestern teacher, who was kind and held my hands in his and thanked me for coming up to talk to him. And then at the beginning of the afternoon session, he told the rest of the class about my comment, saying that “a student” had been “offended” by his advocating greens over chicken. And then he said he didn’t give a shit, that as a teacher he had to risk offending people and he would never make everyone happy. Amen.
I am a teacher too, and I know I will never be all things to all people. Still, it stung that he mocked the truth that was so hard for me to tell him. And I was annoyed that he used the word “offended,” like I was petty and judgmental, like I missed his message because I got all caught up in some technicality. I wasn’t offended at all; I simply wanted to tell him my story and warn him that it could happen to others.
Why didn’t he listen to me? Was his ego so attached to the idea of being a proper vegetarian yogi that he was willing to risk harming someone else? Where was his ahimsa with respect to me? Did he value the chicken’s well-being more than my own?
As I sat with my feelings, though, I realized that none of my questions mattered. I had done what I needed to do. I didn’t need to be angry at him, nor did I need to be embarrassed by taking care of myself and protecting my body and my practice. If he chose not to hear my message, that was his decision.
Corboy
"None of my questions mattered. I had done what I needed to do. I did'nt need to get angry at him."
This teacher violated confidentiality. He had held her hands, communicating warmth and empathy, then used public language that demeaned what she had said to him.
And, she was PAYING this teacher for his expertise and so had consumer rights as well as the basic human right to fair treatment.
The author reported her dismay that the teacher did not reciprocate the respect she had given him.
So to be the type of yogi she'd been trained to be, she strangled her insight at birth and descided her emotions and questions did not matter.
So here she is, using the mindset of yoga culture to invalidate the basic worth of her own perspective, her own feelings her own humanity.
This mindset is not universal but is so frequent in yoga culture that is passes as part of practice.
This is the very mindset that Matthew Remski is concerned about and has analysed in articles quoted further back on this discussion thread.