Wouldn’t it be nice if Tulsi, once and for all, acknowledge that she is affiliated with the Science of Identity Institute. There really is nothing wrong with that. Everyone is entitled to his/her own belief. What the constitution is merely demanding is that there should be a separation between state politics and religion. In fact, it is a sign of maturity for a politician or anybody to conduct earthly affairs without the irrational influences of religious tenets.
She has done many seemingly “principled” decisions in life and politics that are laudable yet controversial. There are thousands upon thousands of war veterans who had seen actions a lot way more than Tulsi, yet only she who could claim to be an expert or knowledgeable in Foreign Affairs due to her service; she fans fear for nuclear war and is very demagoguery about the theological aspect of terrorism.
It is disconcerting with Tulsi’s because her guru does not believe in the separation between the church and the state. She has continually exhibited her devotion to the guru and the movement; she is very forthright with her admiration for India’s controversial leader, Narendra Modi; she has exhibited her biased against Muslims, particularly Syrian refugees; her voting record does not reflect clearly a progressive view, yet hobnobbed with the humanist movement; and she was conspicuously silent in the death of Sri Shim, when she could have just easily dispelled the fear by simply showing up, but instead, stubbornly chose to ride waves with the cult.
To not provide clarity on this, suspicion and doubts remain. To be fair, this applies to all, especially to those seeking powers that affect lives. JFK and Romney were very explicit that their chosen faiths will not interfere with their politics, and even Barack Obama was forced to disavow association with Rev. Jeremiah Wright when the preacher’s incendiary ranting surfaced online. As she inches her way in close to the top prize, I think it’s just fair to expect the same standard applies to Tulsi.
To make the long argument short, we don’t have the bloody knife and the gloves do not exactly fit. All we have is circumstantial evidence. A seemingly avoidable deception is waiting to happen, but is only discernable by us ex-members that our polite society would not even bat an eye on, and we know we can’t leave that in the hands of the judges. To those in the know, ex-members that chose to remain silent instead, to Shyam Dodge and the likes, fuck you all!
She has done many seemingly “principled” decisions in life and politics that are laudable yet controversial. There are thousands upon thousands of war veterans who had seen actions a lot way more than Tulsi, yet only she who could claim to be an expert or knowledgeable in Foreign Affairs due to her service; she fans fear for nuclear war and is very demagoguery about the theological aspect of terrorism.
It is disconcerting with Tulsi’s because her guru does not believe in the separation between the church and the state. She has continually exhibited her devotion to the guru and the movement; she is very forthright with her admiration for India’s controversial leader, Narendra Modi; she has exhibited her biased against Muslims, particularly Syrian refugees; her voting record does not reflect clearly a progressive view, yet hobnobbed with the humanist movement; and she was conspicuously silent in the death of Sri Shim, when she could have just easily dispelled the fear by simply showing up, but instead, stubbornly chose to ride waves with the cult.
To not provide clarity on this, suspicion and doubts remain. To be fair, this applies to all, especially to those seeking powers that affect lives. JFK and Romney were very explicit that their chosen faiths will not interfere with their politics, and even Barack Obama was forced to disavow association with Rev. Jeremiah Wright when the preacher’s incendiary ranting surfaced online. As she inches her way in close to the top prize, I think it’s just fair to expect the same standard applies to Tulsi.
To make the long argument short, we don’t have the bloody knife and the gloves do not exactly fit. All we have is circumstantial evidence. A seemingly avoidable deception is waiting to happen, but is only discernable by us ex-members that our polite society would not even bat an eye on, and we know we can’t leave that in the hands of the judges. To those in the know, ex-members that chose to remain silent instead, to Shyam Dodge and the likes, fuck you all!