Heythere1010101 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Also i tried contacting 3 different people from
> sahaja 3 different times with no response.
> At private ashram meetings things got very weird
> too, mooji would start to pit one thing against
> another until people were defending him and the
> ashram. But even the satsangs were a bit odd amd
> there seemed to always be a formula about them,
> someone would speak out against something and then
> the whole entourage would chime in defense.
> Someone mentioned the young man who spoke out
> about the ashram in an earlier posting during a
> silent retreat. He said "i watched your videos on
> youtube for a long time, and now that im here,
> although i can see how this can help people, i can
> also see how it creates as many problems as it
> solves".
> Zenji, the man who brought the young man to speak
> was thoroughly admonished by mooji and visibly
> shaken, by being associated with someone who had
> just said this. I was in that satsang after the
> young man left the audience was chiming in about
> how "dangerous" or evil he was and how people like
> that should not be allowed in.
> So yeah there was an us against them mentality
> ty for sure.
I find it extrodinary that a person is labelled 'evil' or 'dangerous' just for asking a reasonable question. Moo's teachings can create problems for people. If Moo really were a spiritual guy (which he isn't) then he would just address the man's concerns and there wouldn't be any problem. There wouldn't be an "us against them" mentality.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Also i tried contacting 3 different people from
> sahaja 3 different times with no response.
> At private ashram meetings things got very weird
> too, mooji would start to pit one thing against
> another until people were defending him and the
> ashram. But even the satsangs were a bit odd amd
> there seemed to always be a formula about them,
> someone would speak out against something and then
> the whole entourage would chime in defense.
> Someone mentioned the young man who spoke out
> about the ashram in an earlier posting during a
> silent retreat. He said "i watched your videos on
> youtube for a long time, and now that im here,
> although i can see how this can help people, i can
> also see how it creates as many problems as it
> solves".
> Zenji, the man who brought the young man to speak
> was thoroughly admonished by mooji and visibly
> shaken, by being associated with someone who had
> just said this. I was in that satsang after the
> young man left the audience was chiming in about
> how "dangerous" or evil he was and how people like
> that should not be allowed in.
> So yeah there was an us against them mentality
> ty for sure.
I find it extrodinary that a person is labelled 'evil' or 'dangerous' just for asking a reasonable question. Moo's teachings can create problems for people. If Moo really were a spiritual guy (which he isn't) then he would just address the man's concerns and there wouldn't be any problem. There wouldn't be an "us against them" mentality.