Wombat,
The points I made in my previous post were for the benefit of i yam what i yam, who was worried about me getting into dangerous territory regarding defamation laws. Xivoparig claimed Moo was a rapist and a fraud, so if anyone is going to be sued for defamation, it's most likely going to be Xivoparig.
All I said was that the Moo Foundation seem to get a bit creative with their accounting ( which is not necessarily illegal.) Being accused of being a rapist is a much more serious matter and out of the two accusations, I think being a rapist would be the most likely to procure an allegation of defamation.
That is all I meant by listing those particular comments.
While we are on the topic, I am well aware of defamation laws. I write everything I do based around my own experiences with this cult and I do so without malice. The fact that I post frequently is no indication of malicious intent. I am simply trying to warn the public about this cult.
Where I have discussed things other than my own personal experience, it is to question and explore what other people are saying on this very forum, or else to draw attention to comments which are already freely available in the public sphere on other internet resources.
Where other information comes to light, that is not freely available for anyone to read, I refrain from commenting on it publicly.
I would have to question why you return again and again to a forum that is so at odds with your own deeply held beliefs?
The points I made in my previous post were for the benefit of i yam what i yam, who was worried about me getting into dangerous territory regarding defamation laws. Xivoparig claimed Moo was a rapist and a fraud, so if anyone is going to be sued for defamation, it's most likely going to be Xivoparig.
All I said was that the Moo Foundation seem to get a bit creative with their accounting ( which is not necessarily illegal.) Being accused of being a rapist is a much more serious matter and out of the two accusations, I think being a rapist would be the most likely to procure an allegation of defamation.
That is all I meant by listing those particular comments.
While we are on the topic, I am well aware of defamation laws. I write everything I do based around my own experiences with this cult and I do so without malice. The fact that I post frequently is no indication of malicious intent. I am simply trying to warn the public about this cult.
Where I have discussed things other than my own personal experience, it is to question and explore what other people are saying on this very forum, or else to draw attention to comments which are already freely available in the public sphere on other internet resources.
Where other information comes to light, that is not freely available for anyone to read, I refrain from commenting on it publicly.
I would have to question why you return again and again to a forum that is so at odds with your own deeply held beliefs?