If you look at the official paperwork of the Moo Foundation, you will see an interesting discrepancy in the year 2017.
In 2015, funds raised by "retreats and intensives" is listed as around £980,000 (which is what we would expect)
In 2016, again funds raised from "retreats and intensives" is listed at £890,700.
In 2017, however this figure unexpectedly plummets to only £39,000 raised from "retreats and intensives". Which is absolutely not what we would expect!
But then there is a corresponding rise in funds raised from media and products sales in that same year, 2017 (over £794,000). My guess is that funds they previously claimed were raised from retreats, are now claimed as being raised by 'media and product' sales. Why?
Could be all about minimising tax - a touch of creative accountancy.
In 2015, funds raised by "retreats and intensives" is listed as around £980,000 (which is what we would expect)
In 2016, again funds raised from "retreats and intensives" is listed at £890,700.
In 2017, however this figure unexpectedly plummets to only £39,000 raised from "retreats and intensives". Which is absolutely not what we would expect!
But then there is a corresponding rise in funds raised from media and products sales in that same year, 2017 (over £794,000). My guess is that funds they previously claimed were raised from retreats, are now claimed as being raised by 'media and product' sales. Why?
Could be all about minimising tax - a touch of creative accountancy.