i am quite upset about all this, starting to consider that moo's intentions perhaps aren't all that pure and true.
i still feel that getting to know yourself beyond the body-mind is a valuable thing, at least it is for me. so i got this tool of self inquiry basically from moo and my whole attitude was very forgiving towards his use of what i felt were means to get people to the point where they could recognize themselves as pure awareness.
But now i feel that his approach is not purely aimed towards bringing people to a fundamental insight about themselves, but at the same time towards making people dependent upon him, and submissive towards him. Each time someone is submissive, he awards them plenty compliments and love,regardless of their degree of knowing/being themselves as awareness. On the other hand, people that are in sync with themselves but also with their power of discernment to criticize him are rebuffed and degraded each time, because of supoosed arrogance.
I wonder saharah since you feel that you were hypnotized without your consent, what was the suggestion towards which you were led in your hypnitized state?
i was led towards on the one hand to
a recognition of myself as awareness, which is why i am partly happy,
but also to a belief that personal relationships arent all that important in life
that as long as pure awareness is the primary object of attention all will be well
any engagement with society should be secondary to the realization of the Self
that moo himself is a perfectly realized being beyond faults,
that any amount of watching satsang is healthy and advisable
etc etc...
all of which are ideas that he conveniently never challenges, bacause they support the social arrangement with him firmly in the drivers seat, although they are each strongly antithetical to the core nondual insight of pure awareness.
My conclusion is therefore that he teaches advaita that has a potentially beneficial core , but he does so selfishly, allowing all any any false and illusary beliefs that idolize him and make people depend on his person and satsang offerings.
i still feel that getting to know yourself beyond the body-mind is a valuable thing, at least it is for me. so i got this tool of self inquiry basically from moo and my whole attitude was very forgiving towards his use of what i felt were means to get people to the point where they could recognize themselves as pure awareness.
But now i feel that his approach is not purely aimed towards bringing people to a fundamental insight about themselves, but at the same time towards making people dependent upon him, and submissive towards him. Each time someone is submissive, he awards them plenty compliments and love,regardless of their degree of knowing/being themselves as awareness. On the other hand, people that are in sync with themselves but also with their power of discernment to criticize him are rebuffed and degraded each time, because of supoosed arrogance.
I wonder saharah since you feel that you were hypnotized without your consent, what was the suggestion towards which you were led in your hypnitized state?
i was led towards on the one hand to
a recognition of myself as awareness, which is why i am partly happy,
but also to a belief that personal relationships arent all that important in life
that as long as pure awareness is the primary object of attention all will be well
any engagement with society should be secondary to the realization of the Self
that moo himself is a perfectly realized being beyond faults,
that any amount of watching satsang is healthy and advisable
etc etc...
all of which are ideas that he conveniently never challenges, bacause they support the social arrangement with him firmly in the drivers seat, although they are each strongly antithetical to the core nondual insight of pure awareness.
My conclusion is therefore that he teaches advaita that has a potentially beneficial core , but he does so selfishly, allowing all any any false and illusary beliefs that idolize him and make people depend on his person and satsang offerings.