I absolutely reject any connection to Richard Spencer.
I absolutely detest Nazis.
I do not now nor have I ever hated all Jews.
I have criticized Pamela Geller, but I have never "attacked her for being Jewish".
The Holocaust clearly did happen. It's unfortunate that all anyone can seem to ever mention about it is "six million Jews" and rarely do the other millions of victims get a mention, or movies made about them. If my word count on that subject does not meet your approval, that isn't my problem.
I stand behind my criticism of Brooke Goldstein for using the Lawfare Project to (successfully) enforce censorship. I reject censorship of all kinds, even against the one group of people we are all forbidden from saying anything critical about. Yes, no one is special when it comes to censorship, no one is above the law.
Saying things that are intentionally untrue about a person, in a public forum, for the purpose of damaging or harming that person, does potentially have some legal liability, like if I were to create a thread on a forum accusing Lawrence Estavan of being a rapist. That is not protected speech and he would be well within his rights to take me to court.
But when someone is expressing their political opinions, no matter how vile we might find them - and Holocaust denial is horrible - the way to combat this is not through the tyrannical and Leftist practice of censorship, but rather we fight repugnant free speech with better free speech.
I absolutely detest Nazis.
I do not now nor have I ever hated all Jews.
I have criticized Pamela Geller, but I have never "attacked her for being Jewish".
The Holocaust clearly did happen. It's unfortunate that all anyone can seem to ever mention about it is "six million Jews" and rarely do the other millions of victims get a mention, or movies made about them. If my word count on that subject does not meet your approval, that isn't my problem.
I stand behind my criticism of Brooke Goldstein for using the Lawfare Project to (successfully) enforce censorship. I reject censorship of all kinds, even against the one group of people we are all forbidden from saying anything critical about. Yes, no one is special when it comes to censorship, no one is above the law.
Saying things that are intentionally untrue about a person, in a public forum, for the purpose of damaging or harming that person, does potentially have some legal liability, like if I were to create a thread on a forum accusing Lawrence Estavan of being a rapist. That is not protected speech and he would be well within his rights to take me to court.
But when someone is expressing their political opinions, no matter how vile we might find them - and Holocaust denial is horrible - the way to combat this is not through the tyrannical and Leftist practice of censorship, but rather we fight repugnant free speech with better free speech.