“I don't control what IMDB.com posts.”
I am willing to accept this explanation, at least partially. I am willing to accept that IMDb is an unreliable source, and that Eric Allen Bell may have had nothing to do with the appearance of “Reto30”, and “Junkyard Empire” on his IMDb page. IMDb has a problem with erroneous information placed on pages, and that this may be the case with Eric Allen Bell.
However, there is also this –
So, he does have the option to make corrections. The claim that EAB was paid $350,000 for his involvement in “Wonderland” is false, has been on his IMDb page for years and he knows this. If it was not there, people would not be able to point to it as another example of Eric Allen Bell appropriating other people’s work. If Eric used as much effort at IMDb as he does trying to correct his record here, or on his Wikipedia page, or at Tundra Tabloids, etc. there would be no controversy about misrepresentation.
While we are on the subject of misrepresentation, can Eric Allen Bell tell us why he was claiming for years to be the CEO of Bell Media of Canada on his LinkedIn page? Did the gremlins do that, too? Here is the video evidence of him doing that. [www.youtube.com]
“My livelihood is none of your business. My income is none of your business.”
Please, calm down.
Eric Allen Bell’s finances were widely discussed in 2012. He was begging us for money. He was bankrupt, and blacklisted. Nobody liked him. Even his family had stopped talking to him. He had to sell his car to make ends meet. USAToday wrote about Eric’s finances, and that he had to sell his car. He wrote about it in his piece, “The High Price of Telling the Truth About Islam”. Now, it is a forbidden subject.
I also have to point out that EAB has no problem discussing other people’s income, such as Pamela Geller, and Robert Spencer. He can absolutely libel these people, and give his audience links to Pamela Geller’s financial information, but don’t you dare talk about his money.
I really do not understand this over action. One can search online for media advisor, and find them. They are not hiding. They are boasting of their accomplishments, and high profile clients they have served. They want your business. Eric does not want your business. It is a secret.
This makes no sense, but he is free to run his affairs the way he wants. Nevertheless, he should not be surprised when people start noticing how fishy it smells, especially if he starts attacking them.
“If I took you to court, for cyber stalking”
We have already gone through this; I am not cyberstalking him. I am simply questioning, challenging him in a public forum online. In order for there to be cyberstalking there would have to be things happening such as, unwanted e-mails, or organizing people to sabotage someone, turning people against someone, and trying to get them fired. I do not do that. He does all that to me.
This is all because I am shining a light on his campaign of fraud in 2012. I am talking about his bounty for one quadrillion dollars that he told us was for ten million rupees. That was a lie. He lied about there being death threats in newspapers. He lied about his case working its way to Eric Holder. He lied when he said his website was devoted to the science of consciousness. He was lying when said he never claimed “Jewish Supremacists” control America’s money.
Eric lies, a lot. He has a real problem with this.
“Get some help before you really hurt someone or someone hurts you.”
Eric's threat is duly noted, and will be referenced in the future. Thanks for this.
I am willing to accept this explanation, at least partially. I am willing to accept that IMDb is an unreliable source, and that Eric Allen Bell may have had nothing to do with the appearance of “Reto30”, and “Junkyard Empire” on his IMDb page. IMDb has a problem with erroneous information placed on pages, and that this may be the case with Eric Allen Bell.
However, there is also this –
Quote
Hollywood Reporter
“A spokesperson for IMDb acknowledges the ease with which a prankster can wreak havoc: "We make it easy for users and professionals to update much of our content, which is why we have an 'edit page.' The data that is submitted goes through a series of consistency checks before it goes live. Given the sheer volume of the information, occasional mistakes are inevitable, and, when reported, they are promptly fixed. We always welcome corrections."” [www.hollywoodreporter.com]
So, he does have the option to make corrections. The claim that EAB was paid $350,000 for his involvement in “Wonderland” is false, has been on his IMDb page for years and he knows this. If it was not there, people would not be able to point to it as another example of Eric Allen Bell appropriating other people’s work. If Eric used as much effort at IMDb as he does trying to correct his record here, or on his Wikipedia page, or at Tundra Tabloids, etc. there would be no controversy about misrepresentation.
While we are on the subject of misrepresentation, can Eric Allen Bell tell us why he was claiming for years to be the CEO of Bell Media of Canada on his LinkedIn page? Did the gremlins do that, too? Here is the video evidence of him doing that. [www.youtube.com]
“My livelihood is none of your business. My income is none of your business.”
Please, calm down.
Eric Allen Bell’s finances were widely discussed in 2012. He was begging us for money. He was bankrupt, and blacklisted. Nobody liked him. Even his family had stopped talking to him. He had to sell his car to make ends meet. USAToday wrote about Eric’s finances, and that he had to sell his car. He wrote about it in his piece, “The High Price of Telling the Truth About Islam”. Now, it is a forbidden subject.
I also have to point out that EAB has no problem discussing other people’s income, such as Pamela Geller, and Robert Spencer. He can absolutely libel these people, and give his audience links to Pamela Geller’s financial information, but don’t you dare talk about his money.
I really do not understand this over action. One can search online for media advisor, and find them. They are not hiding. They are boasting of their accomplishments, and high profile clients they have served. They want your business. Eric does not want your business. It is a secret.
This makes no sense, but he is free to run his affairs the way he wants. Nevertheless, he should not be surprised when people start noticing how fishy it smells, especially if he starts attacking them.
“If I took you to court, for cyber stalking”
We have already gone through this; I am not cyberstalking him. I am simply questioning, challenging him in a public forum online. In order for there to be cyberstalking there would have to be things happening such as, unwanted e-mails, or organizing people to sabotage someone, turning people against someone, and trying to get them fired. I do not do that. He does all that to me.
This is all because I am shining a light on his campaign of fraud in 2012. I am talking about his bounty for one quadrillion dollars that he told us was for ten million rupees. That was a lie. He lied about there being death threats in newspapers. He lied about his case working its way to Eric Holder. He lied when he said his website was devoted to the science of consciousness. He was lying when said he never claimed “Jewish Supremacists” control America’s money.
Eric lies, a lot. He has a real problem with this.
“Get some help before you really hurt someone or someone hurts you.”
Eric's threat is duly noted, and will be referenced in the future. Thanks for this.