Quantcast
Channel: Cult Education Forum - "Cults," Sects, and "New Religious Movements"
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12838

Re: Uma Inder , Umaa

$
0
0
Part 2 of the exposé is here:

[www.facebook.com]

And then FACT shared this statement from the victims:

We at FACT post this statement on behalf of several of the victims who wrote to our organization regarding Uma Inder:

"We choose to remain anonymous because of concerns for our safety, for our mental health, and of blackmail.

We have an enormous amount evidence backing up every single one of the accusations we have made about Uma to FACT, and we stand behind every single one. We understand our experience and the evidence may seem contrary to others' perceived positive experience. Everyone has a right to their own perception. For precisely that reason, one person's positive experience does not invalidate or negate another's negative experience. While we were in the cult, we would have responded as they currently do. We understand and have compassion for their inability to fathom another perspective because we've been there while in Uma’s cult. Now that we are out of Uma's mind control, we have the freedom and perspective to independently evaluate our experience. As the School of Sacred Arts stated upon firing Uma, "To thine own self be true."

We also understand that many of Uma’s supporters here may have not been involved with Uma to the extent that we were, and may have only had positive experiences of Uma. This is the norm in cults, where the positive, benign aspects are at the exterior and the negative, abusive aspects arise as one becomes more committed, and one recognizes them only as one frees her or himself from mind control.

We also note that there have been many specific allegations, and neither Uma nor any of her supporters have responded to them specifically, only making generalized statements about Uma's character and that of the injured parties.

We iterate that the motive behind reporting Uma to FACT is to create awareness about a person who we believe to be sick and dangerous. We are all on the road to recovery and would like for others to have access to information we did not—thus hopefully preventing future harm."

--------

In addition, we would like to inform you that Rani Gill (a staunch defender of Uma Inder who is constantly commenting on our posts and seemingly attempting to smear the alleged victims) was not allowed to practice law when she contacted our organization on March 17, 2017 requesting a cease and desist action on our Uma Inder expose. According to the New York State Unified Court System’s website, her license had been suspended and as such she was not allowed to practice law at that time in the state of New York, which we believe was highly unethical and unlawful on her part.

Tomorrow we will continue with Part Three of our Uma Inder expose, regarding our analysis of the allegations.


And then Part 3 is here:

[www.facebook.com]


I’ve been reading some of what’s going on there, and man is it an interesting view of cult-mind. People are VEHEMENTLY defending her...& of course looking like brainwashed fools in the process. (Or at the very least, some are well-meaning people who just haven’t been exposed to Uma’s insanity.)

I really hope this information getting out there helps at least a few of them to see clearly and break free.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12838

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>